bee wrote: Really? Well, maybe you have to be a believer to believe that only believers can distinguish between good and evil. Such vanity! Such prejudice!
Fljots- why are you assuming, that the great philosophers, thinkers and geniuses of mind would have such prejudice and vanity? Because they did not. Just turn the mirror to yourself. Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Socrates, Thomas Moor, Erasmus said nothing about believers or non believers-they were examining human nature and God.
No. YOU said it, my dear. And it was to YOU I was speaking, NOT Aristotle, Aquinas, Erasmus, Moore, Socrates or anyone else. YOU. I responded to YOU; to YOUR comment that:
This concept defines the relationship between human and God thus accordingly, all the following of that concept, ability to differ good and evil, to make a choice etc.
I was giving you the credit for having a thought you didn't get out of a book.
bee wrote:Including yours. Thoughts of these man lay in a very foundation even in your little poetry writings, even if you don't have a clue about it.
Why shouldn't I laugh? Am I not allowed to have a mind of my own, and make my own conclusions about things? Why should I depend on the writings of others -- however eminent -- to form my opinions?
Sure, you can laugh, but you must know, that you are laughing at yourself.
I often do. What's wrong with that?
bee wrote:May be, just may be you can entertain the motion, that perhaps, that mind of your own is not that deep? That, perhaps some cleaning and some learning is due?
Teaching your grandma to suck eggs!

If you only knew me, ROFL!!
bee wrote:Why would you think there are writings of others so eminent?

Perhaps, because they are so much higher and deeper than yours and mine?
Dear - why does THAT mean I have to swallow whole everything everyone wrote in the past? Perhaps I should also accept the doctines of the ancient Assyrians or Babylonians or Egyptians? Or even, coming to modern past times, the doctrines of Hitler in Mein Kampf?
Times change. People move on. Why insist on staying in the past in your head and your opinions?
Not saying those ancient friends of yours didn't have some good thoughts - they surely did - and so did the Bible writers. And yes, they all affect us even today, so far on in the stream or sea of time. But so also do the thoughts of the lowliest flint knapper from the early morning of human history, and the thoughts of the Victorian chimney sweeper.
Do not make the mistake of believing only 'the great and famous' have minds and thoughts worth considering.
I claim no great intellect. I don't have to. Why should I? But I have a mind that can think and form ideas, and express them. Do you? Or do you depend on your ancient great thinkers to think for you?
bee wrote:Because what I wrote was my own thought. Are you the only person capable of thinking, my dear? You must be very young! Let me guess -- a teenage girl?
No, Fljots, I don't think that-for the very reason I mentioned above, there are very wise people to learn from, not to be laughed at. But of course, a wise one can always learn also from a fool.
Yes, I am a teenage girl, who still thinks, that learning is a good thing, which keeps you young always.

I knew it!

None but the very young see in black and white, and are so certain they are right!
I don't mind that, really.

I actually like young people.

I have 3 grandsons. One 22, one 14, 1 almost 3.
As for keeping on learning - yes indeed! I started university at the age of 57 and graduated at the age of 60. I have always loved learning, and I read extensively; but I have learned to to read with an open mind - but one that tends to see flaws in arguments much more readily than I used to as a girl!

As a girl, I swallowed everything whole...
Keep learning, Bee.
