Your accusation that I do not give you enough attention,Jack wrote:Greg
Thank you for the sweet attention you gave to the surface of what I am doing
...
or only superficial attention, is quite consistent of you.
When I first read the poem I got the impression of a
thesis-thesis-thesis-antithesis - implied synthesis,
sort of movement toward the last stanza.
And that's what I thought was really good about it.
The large gesture of it. The fact that it was not just
4 independent stanzas thrown together. It had a
real coherence. It was a gestalt.
But the changes that others were suggesting
all seemed to me to be inconsistent with the big picture.
Most of them seemed to me to either deny it existed,
or else to outright disrespect it. Which I thought was
discourteous of them. Which is why posted what I did.
The fact that I didn't suggest changes or make detailed
comments was not because my reaction was any more
or less superficial than anyone else's. It was because
I believe that the first order of business that anyone
ought to engage in is to clarify and explicate exactly
what the large gesture of the poem really is before doing
anything else. I don't mean they have to be right about it.
I mean they at least have to have the courtesy to the
author to try to understand what he was globally
trying to say, and then perhaps to suggest how he
could have said that better, rather than wildly
suggesting locally better-line changes for purely ad-hoc
reasons. All parts must contribute to the whole.
But you have to be clear about the whole
before you can be clear about the parts.
Feeling that there is a large gesture there,
and being able to express it in words, are not,
of course, exactly the same thing.
And this would that 1/3rd of the time
that I'd want to be sure to make perfect sense,
rather than burden people with my usual 2/3rds nonsense.
So.
If I get the time, and can clearly express what I think
the overall gesture really is, then maybe I'll talk
about all of the little details - in terms of how
well or badly they contribute to the whole.
Until then, I think maybe the best way for me
to indicate, at least in part, where my head's at about this
- and trusting that I'm not being too elliptic
- is to quote the fragment of Leonard Cohen poem
that Jack's poem reminded me of. Namely -
(The full poem was -Not that I did compare,
But I do compare
Now that she's gone.
For Anne
With Annie gone,
whose eyes to compare
With the morning sun?
Not that I did compare,
But I do compare
Now that she's gone.