Why not? Because everyone must become 'like us'? Even if we set aside the arguments about whether things are better just because they are 'natural', vs things are better just because they are 'more advanced', their way of life is as least as valid as ours. It reminds me of a movie, don't recall the title, but Jodie Foster played the part of a girl who was found wild and feral and had made an existence for herself somewhere out in the wilds. She wanted to stay there but 'they' tried to 'civilise' her, and it went to court. One line I clearly recall from the film is her saying: "my sorrows are no greater than yours...".I am not sure these worlds can co-exist.
How long is a question of the extent to which the 'civilised' world abuses their rights and devalues their ways.And even if they do....for how long and to what purpose?
Many tribal cultures do live on literal islands, an ideal place for them. As you know, there remain vast areas of wilderness in the world, and there should be space for everbody, surely.But what if their destiny is to be swallowed up by the overwhelming 'modern civilization' and technology? I dont know that answer to that.
Which of us lead the artificial lives is debatable. I agree that allowing tribes the isolation they need to retain to remain intact will become ever more problematic, with the relentless march of 'progress' and development, and, very sadly, eventually some or many might be swallowed up.Can you realistically (and by necessity artificially) keep tiny islands of 'primitive' society close to nature and to earth in the midst of modern society everywhere?
You are welcome. You have an academic interest? Cool. My interest is not directly related to current tribal societies, but did lead me to take an interest in them. A few years back I wrote a few articles for outdoor magazines about the reasons we are so attracted to the great outdoors. I did a bit of research on evolutionary psychology, and became fascinated by the idea that the mind evolved in tandem with the body to cope with the circumstances of our evolutionary past, and what this might explain. For example, our sense of natural beauty could be related to significant events relating to survival for early man. A lot of natural phenomena is deeply evocative, such as sunsets, thunder, gathering clouds and fire. Such things suggest an imminent and consequential change: darkness, a storm, a blaze, and it would have been of survival value to pay special attention to these things. Also, the features of a landscape that we find beautiful (paths, trees, hills, rivers, trees, mountain ranges) are very much related to land legibility, and survival. I think so much of our true nature, and what inspires us, relates back to our ancestral past, and "primitive" people who still live that way are an immensely valuable part of the world. If we kill them off, it is another nail in the coffin for humanity, and I do feel that strongly about it.BTW thanks for that terrific link. Despite appearances I do have a special academic interest in primitive and isolated societies.
I'd be interested for you to tell me, either here or in PM, about your particular areas of interest.
Good wishes,
Diane