Hi Teratogen ~
I say embrace your anger, and fervor in presenting it as such. You have many years to round the edges of your expression. Part of it will come naturally, and the other part will come by intent and through honing your personal expression. However, there are plenty of the apathetic to more than offset your taking your stands and shouting your views, if 'need' be. The years will have their own effect, which may even become regrettable to you at some point. I feel it's good that you will be able to look back upon how you wrote during this period of your life. Just don't ever give in to the temptation to destroy these writings. Sometimes people do that on the premise that it's just rubbish and pointless rantings.
I recall a feeling of discomfort when I read Laurie's comment awhile back that your writing "reeks of youth" ~ I had no problem with the "youth" part, but "reeks" certainly has a negative connotation attached to the
intensity aspect that I believe now she intended to convey with it. At the time, I wasn't entering in, but considered doing so at that juncture. However, her subsequent comments to you have clarified everything to my satisfaction as far as the 'judgemental' aspect that "reeks" brought to it.
There are those who think everything is just peachy keen. It's not. Without voices such as yours, at this stage of your life, people who care enough to get behind the machinery for change, at a later stage in their life, would probably not be where they need to be
when they need to be there. Your dissenting voice has value. How it comes out is a matter of style. Some won't take you seriously as a result; but your learning will come as a natural process. Some will come, as your
own intention to make your style be different occurs. Some will come as a result of a certain amount of feeling disheartened by it all occurs. For now, shine the light on the things that upset you and express that anger that you feel because of it. That's my own feeling on you and your style.
Now, to this thing you have with the punk set

. It baffles me a bit personally, but that's okay. As I'm recalling, your own personal style appeared to be at least somewhat in the 'Goth' realm, moreso than not, but I can't remember exactly why. I recall your wearing a lot of black, but beyond that, I'm not sure what it might have been, but it seems there was more. I know there are infinite divisions between the various 'styles' of today, so I probably didn't nail it. However, I've heard/read that there is a considerable degree of 'competition' and 'judgementalism' between the various styles. Your thing with the punk set [or pseudo-punk set, as you'd probably clarify]
appears to be [from where I sit] more of that nature. The 'Goth' style is just as 'offensive'/'threatening' to some segments of the general population as the punks. Perhaps, even moreso, as [erroneously] it visually attaches to the 'Satanic underworld.' Those are simply some thoughts, which from your perspective will no doubt set up a grid for analysis of my many errors of observation and understanding

.
Anyway, I enjoy reading your 'unsettling' poetry for the things I see
not escaping the 'youthful' eye. In many ways, the [generalized] 'youth' of today are seen as being self-absorbed in their cell-phone worlds, pretty much oblivious to what's happening outside of it. I see your 'rantings' as messages of hope that the country won't slide into oblivion for the
lack of anyone noticing there was anything/many things wrong.
Well, I've spent
waaaay longer than I'd intended here, and I have much to do at work [where I'm writing from].
My best to you,
Lizzy
So, ahem, where
is YDF? The clock is ticking.........

.