Thanks for posting the title. I hadn't thought the "length of the title sort of
approximates the relative size of the bird," but, yes, it does. And that the
smallness of the bird is so disproportionate to its potential affect upon
others, is telling as well. Smallness, the sensitive young Leonard seemed to
communicate, is no hinderance to greatness of affect when properly placed in time and
circumstance. It's kind of like a gentle, well placed word or other "small" gesture.
-- At the right moment and circumstances, powerful and not so small in what
may be generated.
There is a nature preserve that is dedicated to raptors (eagles among them). It
is the site where hunters in decades past had gathered to shoot them, prior to
their being protected by law. Shooting of the birds was another example of
white man's folly and was not unlike the mass decimation of buffalos for
"sport." More than animals were lost. That an "eaglet" can awaken a
sensitivity that can help to avoid greater pain in the poem's warriors is
poignant. Leonard didn't oversentimentalize the eaglet's "still-born"
status, though. That he didn't is tribute to the subtlety and worthiness of the poem.
On a lighthearted note: Leonard probably wouldn't mind if people were to conclude
that the poem is implying that size doesn't matter.

