It's me again Heathcliff ~

[LaurieAK]

Thanks for all the posts taunting me about the wind-up and then condeming me when i finally respond. Frankly, this was one of the reasons i did not bring it up (it was Margaret) your pitbull tenacity to not let a single little thing go. It was just another thing you would Drag me into. Dragged into it i was.

Thanks for encouraging the tragic Heathcliff to crack me over the head with a "bastard" or two.

You stick your 2 cents into everything. Even when it does not remotely concern you. I have tried out the notion of sticking around here after the judging and just ignoring you. It is impossible. I tried.

I won't be the last member of this forum you drive out. And I most certainly am not the first.

You are the most unaware person I have ever come across in my life. You are truly clueless about your bad behaviors and how they effect others. You have not learned a single thing from any of my complaints or the complaints of others in the past month or so. Nothing has hit home as even remotely a reason to give you cause for a little self assessment. It was too much to hope for.

Be thankful for the friends you have around here.

L

[LaurieAK]

Laurie' Corner.

Loud sobbing from Laurie

YdF: "Awww what's wrong?"

Laurie: "I don't have a coach, no one likes me."

YdF: "Oh forget about being liked. Your obnoxious."

Laurie: "But I want someone to care for me, even if I hate and destroy them for it. I've no one to sponge me down like that bitch <points at Lizzy>
YdF: " Awwwww <throws bucket of water over Laurie> consider yourself sponged down."

DING

thanks "Vince."

[lizzytysh]

In fact, I am thankful for the friends I have around here. That, of course, includes my imaginary ones ~ with whom you just can't leave me to be alone. No respect .

Check out these words:

taunting
condemning
pitbull
Dragged
tragic Heathcliff
crack me over the head
"bastard"
stick
2 cents
everything
drive
unaware
ever
clueless
bad behaviors
complaints
remotely
too much

What a vocabulary list.

Hmmm. Now, let me see. I was being supportive of Heathcliffe, along with others being supportive of Heathcliffe . . . and then came you . . . and . . . "2 cents" ~ that sounds about right. [An aside here is that you can drone on (in keeping with your bee references) all you like about the wind-up issue, I'll always have the words you wrote to convince me, should I ever falter as a result of your continuing 'onslaughts' regarding same ~ but 't'ain't likely.]

I was in a thread I created, talking about an unfolding catastrophe . . . and then came you . . . and . . . "2 cents" ~ that sounds about right.

Your modeling of a reliable, working definition of good behaviors, I take it, would include [but not be limited to ]:

self-flagellating
QE1
rattle on
ridiculous post (by you)
Get a clue
attack me
vindictive
drag my
beg Heath
beat me
uncaring cretin
fucking imaginary
tragic, Wuthering Heights character

Cutting that train of thought a little short, due to lack of time, I'll move on.

I have tried out the notion of sticking around here after the judging and just ignoring you. It is impossible. I tried.

To that I can only say, how about if you reflect on some of your own, good advice:

Dear [Laurie~]
Quit whining and grow some whiskers.

It is my best advice.

Everything else, time will heal. No, scratch that. Time will suppress. Yeah, that's the ticket.

regards,
[Lizzy]

[LaurieAK]

I spoke those words to an imaginary character.

I would never stoop that low and say those things to a real person who was really hurting.

The only reason I am typing at the moment is because you were fool enough to believe Heathcliff and then found, no looked for opportunity to use my post against me. The only problem is, you had no idea Why i posted what I did. So it all back-fired on you, oh compassionate one. You dragged it up. You thought it unfair that I was not reprimanded. You didn't complain about my post when it happened. Only when it became opportunistic for YOU. Poor imaginary Heathcliff.

You are not just un-self-aware, you are a bully.

toodles,
Laurie

[tom.d.stiller]

Christmas will be here soon. I'm crying as I write this. Where is Laurie? June? Anyone. Anyone!

(bolds by me)

Dear all,

I'm not sure about who started the whole enmity that's pouring off of every page of this incredible, inedible thread. And I really don't care. the trouble with fights like that is no one ever starts them, but suddenly they're there, hopping from one thread to the next.

This thread got started with something that is everything but a genuine complaint by someone who's simply whining. (Margaret, you immediately sensed that.) It seems to be a trap laid out. Dunno by whom. Don't even care.

The only thing I'm quite sure about is that there are many more screen names than persons in this thread.

Just as a reminder: When the character posing as 'Heathcliff' first came to these Wuthering Heights - was it in March? - Laurie took exactly the same position towards his posts as this time. And now this thread starts with calling Laurie in?

Believe it! A square is a circle! Believe it! I'm Emily Bronte. Believe it!

This is madness, yet there's some method in't.

tom

PS:

When I read

It went off track with erroneous interpretation because it happened to be Laurie; and would've had far less of an inflammatory effect, had it been anyone else [unless the someone else's had been Bee or Linda L., and then the same thing would've happened ].

I feel inclined to say that thy judgment should never be tainted by who is writing, but by what is written. This, I state it explicitely, is addressed to all the combattants.

tom

[Heathcliffe]

I'm not cut out for the games on this board. Yes, tom d. stiller, I did ask for Laurie and June, when I came back on the board, I also asked for "Anyone. Anyone!" I don't play silly games with aliases, I am not a figment of imagination. Also, if you really don't care tom d. stiller why have you bothered getting involved at all? If I couldn't care less about something then I wouldn't have written. Some people have really p*ssed me off - like you have done with your replete comments which have had no constructive viewpoint whatsoever - just a cheap, childish jibe and ridicule at the cost of someone else's sanity. Goodbye.

[lizzytysh]

Well, Tom, it would seem you've done some research. However, as Heathcliff has pointed out, if you don't care, why are you here?

In the beginning I weighed out whether I thought Heathcliffe's issues were real or not. Finally, decided they were, and then entered into [what has now become] the fray. If I made an error in judgement with that assessment ~ I was hurting no one by it, and attacking no one in the process.

When I saw the "where is"'s, I had no idea Heathcliffe was referring to people here, but thought they were previous girlfriends [vs. lovers] of his.

If I were on a hunting expedition, I could and would have cited Linda L's posting. I could have suggested she was being sarcastic, flippant, uncaring, or whatever, but in that I wasn't looking for a fight, I had no reason to. She said what she did, and it was borderline [if at all ~ as it actually sounded more like a typical comment of hers], whether she was trying to be hurtful. Even with Laurie, I said nothing.

You don't seem[?] to get it that I only responded regarding Laurie after Heathcliffe bashed Vince. Fair is fair. The operative words in it were, "If your harsh response to Vince is to stand, then what about Laurie's post to you?" Pretty simple. As soon as he apologized regarding Vince, I dropped it about Laurie. A manhunt does not operate like that.

I also would not suggest that he call her a "bastard" once, much less twice! That's not even the appropriate word ~ and once, of any name-calling word would do, if he were 'evening the score.' My preference ~ pretty obvious to anyone with two eyes open ~ was that he simply take it back regarding Vince, which he did, and I adjusted my track on it, as well.

Laurie ~

I spoke those words to an imaginary character.

So, what difference would it make if that same, imaginary character called you names? It would simply be part of the mega-plot of his imaginary story, and have given you a supporting [though not supportive] role.

What I am left to wonder with all of this is where does this victim mentality come from? When I was minding my own business, as I was experiencing real feelings of grief regarding Hurricane Katrina, you flounced in to announce that I can only be happy when self-flagellating, etc. I was feeling sad for otherswho, and a beloved, historical area that, were real victims. Others. You have been here feeling sad, crushed, and victimized for yourself, who is not in any sense, a victim. Self. Now, let's re-introduce the word, "Self-flagellation," and who is only happy when it's occurring.

I would never stoop that low and say those things to a real person who was really hurting.

You already did ~ to me.

~ Lizzy

[LaurieAK]

The initial thread, besides its very questionable content was made more questionable by it being an entity that was making their first post AND calling me and others by name. It was a slam dunk that it was a *joke*/ troll.

Heathcliff with and without an e came into being on This thread. A newcomer wouldn't know to name names. Even the 'tragic' name itself was a give away. And I didn't need another hint, but I was even more positive when Heath forgot his (one of many) passwords and had to re-enter with the e.

Sure. Say i am making this up After the fact. Thing is, I was clever enough to see this from the start and wasn't the only one.

My personal response was a joke. It would have been rude to do a "call out" of this fool after several others were passing out cyber tissue on his behalf. I just played it like i saw it and thenkept my mouth shut, while others coddled this imaginary fool. Kept my mouth shut that is until Lizzy got vigilante on my ass....

L
Oh bonus:

I would never stoop that low and say those things to a real person who was really hurting.

You already did ~ to me.

Um, Liz, you copied my bullshit response to 'heath' and handed it to me. What a sweetie.

[/quote]

[LaurieAK]

When I was minding my own business, as I was experiencing real feelings of grief regarding Hurricane Katrina, you flounced in to announce that I can only be happy when self-flagellating, etc. I was feeling sad for otherswho, and a beloved, historical area that, were real victims. Others. You have been here feeling sad, crushed, and victimized for yourself, who is not in any sense, a victim. Self. Now, let's re-introduce the word, "Self-flagellation," and who is only happy when it's occurring.

I'm sorry lizz that you had to witness this tragedy. Btw, we all did. We all felt awful. You flooded the board with your play by play and raw emotions like a child out of control.

Just because i am the only one complaining in public doesn't mean i am the only one who wants you to stop doing this. It is self serving.

Like i said before, clueless.

L

[lizzytysh]

Laurie ~

Heathcliff~

For gawds sake you are in no condition to find a mate.

You sound whiney and self absorbed, to put it kindly.

You need to work on fixing yourself, creating your own reality, setting your own path and stop looking for someone to complete you. Finding a mate under these circumstances is doomed. Read the tea leaves. They are there for a reason.

Fix yourself and ask the hard questions of yourself...and answer them before proceeding.

You may not take it this way but i am trying to helpful and completely serious.

regards,
Laurie

Your initial posting back in March [at which point some others did take his expressed pain seriously] in NO way corroborates the "bullshit" notion that you think he was on a wind-up ~ then or now. It only serves to elucidate your attitude toward people openly expressing their pain. It is ~ once again ~ abundantly clear that you took him to be a real person then, the same as you did now. It is equally, abundantly clear that you had no time for his expressions, and chose derision as a response. Has it EVER occurred to you that someone age 23 may not have the coping skills for real life that you , twice his age, don't even have for friggin' cyberlife!

Take all those whiney, self-absorbed words and eat them along with the ones I've already given you back. That saying goes to the effect of be careful of the words you use, as you one day may have to eat them. So, chow down, honey.

~ Lizzy

[lizzytysh]

You flooded the board

Get a grip and learn the very simple difference between a thread and the board, and what constitutes real flooding.

Lesson 1. Return tomorrow [or later today, if your level of progress should increase].

In FACT, the vast majority of that thread had ZERO expressions regarding Katrina, but was merely a documentation, for a purpose I declared at the onset.

Your sense of entitlement allowed you to come give your 2 cents, though, didn't it? "Sweetie."

By the way, you knew Heathcliffe was a real person, then ~ and your lack of compassion was at an identical level to the real person you encountered now.

Do you find it odd that someone might forget their password? It happens all the time.

Speaking of "Queens," such an ivory tower you seem to live in ~ The Ice Queen, mayhaps? I'd rather be ridiculed for being too-too compassionate, caring, bleeding heart, whatever, than to hand out 'responses' like the one of yours quote in the above post. It's becoming clearer to me that you simply cannot deal with people speaking their real, true feelings. If they cloak them in poetry or humour, fine. But, don't just let them lay there raw and unadorned.

~ Lizzy

[Young dr. Freud]

Where is Squidgy when we need her.



YdF

[lizzytysh]

You sound whiney and self absorbed, to put it kindly.

Your kindness is overwhelming.

[lizzytysh]

Laurie took exactly the same position towards his posts as this time

Yes, unarguably, she did. However, that "same position" had nothing to do with "wind-up."

"Believe it! A square is a circle. Believe it!"

********************************************************

Speaking of things that "come to mind," "whiney and self-absorbed" have certainly surfaced lately in mine, and having zero to do with Heathcliffe himself.

~ Lizzy

[LaurieAK]

Lizz in your world, you are never wrong.

Please leave me out of it.

Laurie
p.s. I am notreadinganotherthingyoupost mode since my post previous to this...hope you got IT outta your system.
Take a chill pill or something.