Ms. Stalker ~
Since:
I presumed your behind-the-scenes attempts to be 'tests' and did not respond by bringing them here, or by even bothering to respond to you.
You have tried to feign absolute innocence and only the highest of motives and goals.
To be only the utmost in sincerity in trying to, I guess we would say, get along/repair damaged bridges.
You have required 'forcing the issue' to even own up to having communicated with me behind the scenes, albeit not a completed [answered] communication.
Now a behind-the-scenes communication must meet some arbitrary measure of being "threatening or intimidating." The word I used was "abusive."
You continue to proclaim that
you have been damaged by my supposed cruel ways.
You have just publicly proclaimed "I haven't sent you PM since that comp. and never will."
You continue to insist that "My sincere desire to communicate with you exists."
Since all of that, and more I'm not even bothering with, is in place, I can only ask why you would choose a private e-mail for these messages, rather than these messages being posted here, where they might interfere with your "Lovely" personae, or why a private e-mail wouldn't have arrived bearing a
different type of message. One which might be construed as a sincere desire. After all, time was taken up to seek my private, though publicly posted, e-mail address. Time was taken to write your message and send it. What was your, well-intentioned intent of these messages from you, Linda? These messages, which you have all but categorically denied existing, were it not for my continued, differing ways of approaching their existence, to confront you on them?
Since, by your own admission:
As we've not communicated behind closed doors since the comp., when you so graciously helped in my copy and paste handicap, I can't see that any pact of privacy would be, or could be, of relevance.
Since, you recalled an instance where you could again pat yourself on the back:
Wait a minute, I remember wrapping my loving arms around you when you were going thru your time of trouble. The posts you left on the board thanking me for my comfort and John K. for the right way to spell your name (or was it John Etherington, sorry, both Johns).
I am certain you have no objections ["I can't see that any pact of privacy would be, or could be, of relevance"] to my now bringing them here for your perusal. Perhaps, constructive communication can follow, here in public, since you obviously have no desire to do so privately:
From: "Lovely Lakelover"
To:
lizzytysh2088@yahoo.com
Subject: Do you
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:31:02 -0500
ever shut up?
From: "Lovely Lakelover"
To:
lizzytysh2088@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:50:56 -0500
Stop while you can, Lizzytysh! I can imagine that even your most ardent supporters are dropping like flies at this point! LLL
Albeit they were not successful, both of these unsolicited and unanswered e-mails come squarely under the label, "
attempts to intimidate."
Now, "big girl," before you go running, calling foul, revisit your own words [in the paragraph just preceding the first quote], and your own suggestions for ways of being, and your own claims regarding yourself. I've deleted your private, e-mail address, you'll notice.
All I ask is that you insert "e-mail" into what you "never will"-again claim. That is unless you have a
sincere desire to communicate. Despite what could appear as your fraudulent representation of self, here, I actually do remain open to
SINCERE desire. So far, I've yet to see it.......privately or here.
~ Ms. Attackee
what is going on here. Nice try with that figure of speech, though.
.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
