I didn't say all that much.
Linda.
Leonard Cohen the great deceiver of men.
-
linda_lakeside
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea..
-
Daniel Harmisson
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:26 pm
My goal for this post is to denounce those who claim that no one is smart enough to see through Mr. Leonard Cohen's transparent lies. I shall do this in the only honest way that I can, which is by simply setting forth those principles that I personally believe in and that I personally observe and honor.
For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. He supports a wide variety of conjectures. Some are shallow; others are larcenous. A few openly support sensationalism.
Let's be frank: He is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every conceited ideology finds expression in Leonard Cohen. Have you ever had a bad dream about him trying to hasten the destruction of our civilization? Well, I have news for you. That wasn't a dream; it was real. Lest I seem like a hypocrite, I should tell you that he has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that he knows 100% of everything 100% of the time.
He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." Mr. Cohen's double standards are intellectually and morally indefensible. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it sincerely expresses how Mr. Cohen's anecdotes are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.
If you've never seen Mr. Cohen force me to roll over and play dead, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. As I gaze into my crystal ball, I see that his worshippers will drive us into a state of apoplexy in a lustrum or two. What's more, he believes that the most subhuman criminals you'll ever see have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us.
Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one. All such combinations of audacity with ignorance would be supremely ridiculous but for one consideration: Some deranged, flippant galoots actually feel that Mr. Cohen holds a universal license that allows him to lock people up for reading the "wrong" types of books or listening to the "wrong" kinds of music. This is the kind of muddled thinking that he is encouraging with his undertakings. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as audacious sideshow barkers.
There are some self-deceiving freeloaders who are feeble-minded. There are also some who are froward. Which category does Mr. Cohen fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". This is far from all I have to say on the topic, but it's certainly enough for now. Just remember one thing: I am troubled by Mr. Leonard Cohen's constant exaggerations and half-truths.
For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. He supports a wide variety of conjectures. Some are shallow; others are larcenous. A few openly support sensationalism.
Let's be frank: He is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every conceited ideology finds expression in Leonard Cohen. Have you ever had a bad dream about him trying to hasten the destruction of our civilization? Well, I have news for you. That wasn't a dream; it was real. Lest I seem like a hypocrite, I should tell you that he has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that he knows 100% of everything 100% of the time.
He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." Mr. Cohen's double standards are intellectually and morally indefensible. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it sincerely expresses how Mr. Cohen's anecdotes are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.
If you've never seen Mr. Cohen force me to roll over and play dead, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. As I gaze into my crystal ball, I see that his worshippers will drive us into a state of apoplexy in a lustrum or two. What's more, he believes that the most subhuman criminals you'll ever see have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us.
Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one. All such combinations of audacity with ignorance would be supremely ridiculous but for one consideration: Some deranged, flippant galoots actually feel that Mr. Cohen holds a universal license that allows him to lock people up for reading the "wrong" types of books or listening to the "wrong" kinds of music. This is the kind of muddled thinking that he is encouraging with his undertakings. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as audacious sideshow barkers.
There are some self-deceiving freeloaders who are feeble-minded. There are also some who are froward. Which category does Mr. Cohen fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". This is far from all I have to say on the topic, but it's certainly enough for now. Just remember one thing: I am troubled by Mr. Leonard Cohen's constant exaggerations and half-truths.
-
linda_lakeside
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea..
Daniel, I would copy and paste the more relevant points in your most entertaining soliloquy, however, space is limited. Therefore, I'll just say that I agree in the utmost that Leonard Cohen is indeed a deceiver of men and little children too. He is a bad, bad man.
Thank you for typing for such a long time.
Linda.
Thank you for typing for such a long time.
Linda.
-
Byron
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 3:01 pm
- Location: Mad House, Eating Tablets, Cereals, Jam, Marmalade and HONEY, with Albert
Dear Daniel Harmison,
I should like to point out that your intense, and yet, shallow, but, intriguing posts have caused me to apply extra cartridges of ink to my trusty printer wot is joined to me computer. I have taken the liberty of downloading your pieces onto best vellum and will give them all due consideration at the right time and in the right place.
It was ms lakesud's mention of pidgeon poo wot gave me the idea for the appropriate place to hang your worthy tombs.
Be happy and safe in the knowledge that, ever more I shall be giving the writings of Dear Daniel, all the effort and concentration I can muster, as I sit quietly behind my closed door, closseted within the bowels of me 'umble abode.
Yours dribblingly (at my age there's a lot of dribbling)
Benghis Kan, Ward 12b, top floor, Secure Unit, Bedlam.
I should like to point out that your intense, and yet, shallow, but, intriguing posts have caused me to apply extra cartridges of ink to my trusty printer wot is joined to me computer. I have taken the liberty of downloading your pieces onto best vellum and will give them all due consideration at the right time and in the right place.
It was ms lakesud's mention of pidgeon poo wot gave me the idea for the appropriate place to hang your worthy tombs.
Be happy and safe in the knowledge that, ever more I shall be giving the writings of Dear Daniel, all the effort and concentration I can muster, as I sit quietly behind my closed door, closseted within the bowels of me 'umble abode.
Yours dribblingly (at my age there's a lot of dribbling)
Benghis Kan, Ward 12b, top floor, Secure Unit, Bedlam.
"Bipolar is a roller-coaster ride without a seat belt. One day you're flying with the fireworks; for the next month you're being scraped off the trolley" I said that.
-
linda_lakeside
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea..
-
linda_lakeside
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea..
-
Daniel Harmisson
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:26 pm
It is imperative that I give you the following information, which Prof. Achilles wants concealed from the public. It concerns not just his useless contributions to this Forum, his total ignorance of the political shenanigans of Leonard cohen, but also his penchant extremite for false identity accusations
First and foremost, relative to just a few years ago, daft lame-brained-types are nearly ten times as likely to believe that hanging out with the worst classes of overweening-to-the-core, useless kooks I've ever seen is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. This is neither a coincidence nor simply a sign of the times. Rather, it reflects a sophisticated, psychological warfare program designed by Prof. Achilles to break down ages-old institutions and customs.
A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of impertinent, merciless brigands and others in Prof. Achilles's amen corner are about to make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. I have no reason to doubt that story because if I were to compile a list of Prof. Achilles's forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that Prof. Achilles has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to make excessive use of foul language.
On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that he labels anyone he doesn't like as "mephitic". That might well be a better description of Prof. Achilles. Prof. Achilles operates on an international scale to impede the free flow of information. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to straighten out Prof. Achilles's thinking. Now, lest you jump to the conclusion that pharisaism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us, I assure you that many people respond to his hateful contrivances in much the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we open minds instead of closing them. Prof. Achilles says that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that his ventures are all sweetness and light.
To be honest, as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, his janissaries don't really care that cameralism doesn't work. So why does Prof. Achilles cling to it? The answer may surprise you, especially when you consider that Prof. Achilles's idea of libidinous feudalism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of an infantile blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a wayward and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to a prurient frenzy and then prompts them to separate people from their roots and cut their bonds to their natural communities. So let me make it clear that there is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of dodgy, humorless foolish-types, but the hope that makes you eager to embrace diversity.
If we are powerless to solve the problems that are important to most people, it is because we have allowed Prof. Achilles to stigmatize any and all attempts to fight for what is right. He says that he is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. The inference is that Prof. Achilles is a model citizen. I'm happy to report that I can't follow that logic.
I see two problems with his self-fulfilling prophecies on a very fundamental level. First, we must shake off our torpor, ignore the siren songs of absolutism, and lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. And second, he wants us to believe that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". How stupid does he think we are? The answer to this question gives the key not only to world history, but to all human culture.
I challenge all of the violent trolls out there to consider this: If you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will indisputably find that one of the great mysteries of modern life is, Why can't he live among us in peace? Is there a need for a Perth or a Paints?
He doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't bear witness to the plain, unvarnished truth. I want to give people more information about Prof. Achilles, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I undoubtedly hope people draw: Every so often, you'll see Prof. Achilles lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for seeking to make our lives an endless treadmill of government interferences while providing few real benefits to our health and happiness, and vow never again to be so stingy. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that he has been known to say that his activities are our final line of defense against tyrrany. That notion is so foul, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. Prof. Achilles and several groups of self-satisfied used-car salesmen are in cahoots to funnel significant amounts of money to deplorable Achilles clones. The denial of this fact only proves the effrontery, and also the stupidity, of peevish, garrulous smut peddlers. Although he wants to force me to undergo "treatment" to cure my "problem", if we fail to tell Prof. Achilles what we all think of him -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use -- then we have no one to blame but ourselves.
I'm not going to respond to his belief systems beyond saying that he disguises his iron fist with a velvet glove, period. In spite of the fact that Prof. Achilles was voted "most likely to assail all that is holy" by his peers, his inveracities may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into mudslinging, chthonic Marxism.
For one thing, he conducts himself in a superciliously pompous manner. But more important, he would have us believe that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Prof. Achilles is surrounded by shabby misfits who parrot the same nonsense, which is why you may have noticed that this will become even more obvious in the years just ahead. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, on a television program last night, I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "Prof. Achilles's publicity stunts are a parody of original thought." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual. Prof. Achilles claims that you and I are morally inferior to the most inhumane doomsday prophets I've ever seen. I respond that he has really pulled a fast one this time.
Does he remember the hurt and hate in the eyes of the people he made fun of just so others would like him more? Even if he does, I'm sure he doesn't care, because if I were a complete sap, I'd believe his line that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Unfortunately for him, I realize that Prof. Achilles's imprecations represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death.
If nothing else, Prof. Achilles maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around him. There's a word for that: libel. Whenever someone tells him not to put the prisoners in charge of running the prison, Prof. Achilles gets all teary-eyed. My, my; how sad. My heart bleeds for him, it really does. Let him go run for the money,as Leonard, his hero, so boringly exclaims.
In this post, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I am trying to convince Prof. Achilles that arrogant proletariats like him often think they have the right to rip off everyone and his brother. As I expect, Prof. Achilles will be totally unconvinced.
If he continues to impose a one-size-fits-all model on how society should function, the result can be a tone-deafness, a cluelessness, on matters that are at the center of experience for vast segments of the population. I, not being one of the many grumpy fence-sitters of this world, have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that no matter what terms are used, he treats serious issues callously and somewhat flippantly. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. In the end, the most telling thing is that the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how crude and pompous Prof. Achilles has become.
The purpose of this post is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how he possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. One last thing: Eventually, Prof. Achilles's strictures will turn fault-finders loose against us good citizens.
First and foremost, relative to just a few years ago, daft lame-brained-types are nearly ten times as likely to believe that hanging out with the worst classes of overweening-to-the-core, useless kooks I've ever seen is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. This is neither a coincidence nor simply a sign of the times. Rather, it reflects a sophisticated, psychological warfare program designed by Prof. Achilles to break down ages-old institutions and customs.
A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of impertinent, merciless brigands and others in Prof. Achilles's amen corner are about to make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. I have no reason to doubt that story because if I were to compile a list of Prof. Achilles's forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that Prof. Achilles has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to make excessive use of foul language.
On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that he labels anyone he doesn't like as "mephitic". That might well be a better description of Prof. Achilles. Prof. Achilles operates on an international scale to impede the free flow of information. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to straighten out Prof. Achilles's thinking. Now, lest you jump to the conclusion that pharisaism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us, I assure you that many people respond to his hateful contrivances in much the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we open minds instead of closing them. Prof. Achilles says that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that his ventures are all sweetness and light.
To be honest, as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, his janissaries don't really care that cameralism doesn't work. So why does Prof. Achilles cling to it? The answer may surprise you, especially when you consider that Prof. Achilles's idea of libidinous feudalism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of an infantile blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a wayward and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to a prurient frenzy and then prompts them to separate people from their roots and cut their bonds to their natural communities. So let me make it clear that there is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of dodgy, humorless foolish-types, but the hope that makes you eager to embrace diversity.
If we are powerless to solve the problems that are important to most people, it is because we have allowed Prof. Achilles to stigmatize any and all attempts to fight for what is right. He says that he is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. The inference is that Prof. Achilles is a model citizen. I'm happy to report that I can't follow that logic.
I see two problems with his self-fulfilling prophecies on a very fundamental level. First, we must shake off our torpor, ignore the siren songs of absolutism, and lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. And second, he wants us to believe that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". How stupid does he think we are? The answer to this question gives the key not only to world history, but to all human culture.
I challenge all of the violent trolls out there to consider this: If you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will indisputably find that one of the great mysteries of modern life is, Why can't he live among us in peace? Is there a need for a Perth or a Paints?
He doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't bear witness to the plain, unvarnished truth. I want to give people more information about Prof. Achilles, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I undoubtedly hope people draw: Every so often, you'll see Prof. Achilles lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for seeking to make our lives an endless treadmill of government interferences while providing few real benefits to our health and happiness, and vow never again to be so stingy. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that he has been known to say that his activities are our final line of defense against tyrrany. That notion is so foul, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. Prof. Achilles and several groups of self-satisfied used-car salesmen are in cahoots to funnel significant amounts of money to deplorable Achilles clones. The denial of this fact only proves the effrontery, and also the stupidity, of peevish, garrulous smut peddlers. Although he wants to force me to undergo "treatment" to cure my "problem", if we fail to tell Prof. Achilles what we all think of him -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use -- then we have no one to blame but ourselves.
I'm not going to respond to his belief systems beyond saying that he disguises his iron fist with a velvet glove, period. In spite of the fact that Prof. Achilles was voted "most likely to assail all that is holy" by his peers, his inveracities may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into mudslinging, chthonic Marxism.
For one thing, he conducts himself in a superciliously pompous manner. But more important, he would have us believe that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Prof. Achilles is surrounded by shabby misfits who parrot the same nonsense, which is why you may have noticed that this will become even more obvious in the years just ahead. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, on a television program last night, I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "Prof. Achilles's publicity stunts are a parody of original thought." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual. Prof. Achilles claims that you and I are morally inferior to the most inhumane doomsday prophets I've ever seen. I respond that he has really pulled a fast one this time.
Does he remember the hurt and hate in the eyes of the people he made fun of just so others would like him more? Even if he does, I'm sure he doesn't care, because if I were a complete sap, I'd believe his line that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Unfortunately for him, I realize that Prof. Achilles's imprecations represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death.
If nothing else, Prof. Achilles maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around him. There's a word for that: libel. Whenever someone tells him not to put the prisoners in charge of running the prison, Prof. Achilles gets all teary-eyed. My, my; how sad. My heart bleeds for him, it really does. Let him go run for the money,as Leonard, his hero, so boringly exclaims.
In this post, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I am trying to convince Prof. Achilles that arrogant proletariats like him often think they have the right to rip off everyone and his brother. As I expect, Prof. Achilles will be totally unconvinced.
If he continues to impose a one-size-fits-all model on how society should function, the result can be a tone-deafness, a cluelessness, on matters that are at the center of experience for vast segments of the population. I, not being one of the many grumpy fence-sitters of this world, have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that no matter what terms are used, he treats serious issues callously and somewhat flippantly. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. In the end, the most telling thing is that the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how crude and pompous Prof. Achilles has become.
The purpose of this post is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how he possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. One last thing: Eventually, Prof. Achilles's strictures will turn fault-finders loose against us good citizens.
-
linda_lakeside
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea..
-
Daniel Harmisson
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:26 pm
In this post, I would like to share with you some thoughts I originally organized to embrace diversity. For the sake of review, Mr. Fake Mirth has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. I his fantasy world he pretends that the rest of us are not pretending that we don’ty know who he really is, the alter lesser ego of the twin troll Perth.
Then again, just because Mr. Mirth is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. Nice try to diminish our will to live, Mr. Mirth. Currently, his ramblings merely move prurient communism from the boisterous fringe into a realm of respectability. As you will see one day, this is only the tip of a gigantic iceberg.
His troll games are a disgraceful, counter-productive carnival of quislingism. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that my goal is to reveal the nature and activity of his trained seals and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims.
I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I indisputably do have to try. If you wonder why I take the stance that I do, it's because Mr. Mirth has nothing but contempt for Leonard Cohen, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that his statements such as "I know who Pert is" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the hitsory file by any open and honest individual. Whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to give any poster here the values that will inspire them to name and shame his expositors for their lazy acts of frotteurism.
Most people want to be nice; they want to be polite; they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness, they step aside and let Mr. Mirth advocate measures that others criticize for being excessively disruptive.
One of his favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to cause the destruction of human ambition and joy on this Forum, never the original problem.
Why does Comstockism exist? What causes it? And why can't we all just get along? To understand the answers to those questions, you first have to realize that Mr. Mirth claims that the ideas of "freedom" and "animalism" are Siamese twins. Well, I beg to differ. In short, Mr. Fake Mirth cannot completely conceal his true animus and inspiration. He is what non-academics call a "self-abuser" but academics call "a self-abuser".
Has he ever spoken about his Master publicly? This is either because he is an ignorant troll or a Leonard Cohen political plant.
Then again, just because Mr. Mirth is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. Nice try to diminish our will to live, Mr. Mirth. Currently, his ramblings merely move prurient communism from the boisterous fringe into a realm of respectability. As you will see one day, this is only the tip of a gigantic iceberg.
His troll games are a disgraceful, counter-productive carnival of quislingism. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that my goal is to reveal the nature and activity of his trained seals and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims.
I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I indisputably do have to try. If you wonder why I take the stance that I do, it's because Mr. Mirth has nothing but contempt for Leonard Cohen, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that his statements such as "I know who Pert is" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the hitsory file by any open and honest individual. Whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to give any poster here the values that will inspire them to name and shame his expositors for their lazy acts of frotteurism.
Most people want to be nice; they want to be polite; they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness, they step aside and let Mr. Mirth advocate measures that others criticize for being excessively disruptive.
One of his favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to cause the destruction of human ambition and joy on this Forum, never the original problem.
Why does Comstockism exist? What causes it? And why can't we all just get along? To understand the answers to those questions, you first have to realize that Mr. Mirth claims that the ideas of "freedom" and "animalism" are Siamese twins. Well, I beg to differ. In short, Mr. Fake Mirth cannot completely conceal his true animus and inspiration. He is what non-academics call a "self-abuser" but academics call "a self-abuser".
Has he ever spoken about his Master publicly? This is either because he is an ignorant troll or a Leonard Cohen political plant.