Good Night Smokey troll

Smokey · Post by **Smokey** » Mon Dec 13, 2004 6:51 pm

Yes, Avalon it would indeed be terrible to have a man representing you who spends all of his working hours trolling a poetry forum. Creating one boring identity after another and patheticaly answering his own posts. What a pathetic LIAR, DISSEMBLER, and FRAUD.

Critic2 · Post by **Critic2** » Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:00 pm

Smokey wrote:Hi Michael, you got it just right before. I feel completely stuck in this argument. Can we find away to call a truce without me losing face completely? If you change my classification to pp I promise I will shut up! Deal?

smokey's latest private message to me. I need to ask my computer guy if there is a way to stop pm's from the Baby Trolls as well as automatically deleting their posts.

lizzytysh · Post by **lizzytysh** » Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:04 pm

Whoops. I just realized that my most recent post here may have sounded as though I endorse 'attacks,' as long as they're humourous. Not the case!

Critic2 · Post by **Critic2** » Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:06 pm

you are safe from misinterpretation, you long ago ceased to be the target of the Baby Troll, Avalon. she and the smoky family are pleasuring themselves elsewhere nowadays!

William C. · Post by **William C.** » Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:09 pm

Michael:

Do you want to be fired? Then get back to work!

Byron · Post by **Byron** » Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:45 pm

WC, may I plea on michael's behalf to gain a bargain from you.
Any man wot can assemble a card bored box wivout many 'oles, must 'ave sum redeaming feetxxxx....sorry, new computer nerd with bilt in typosystem version 8.3 and a half. As we were saying, his feet have to have some redemptions, what with A Valon dropping everything before them. As the chinese proverb says, each journey starts with weeks of indecision. Let young michael have his frollicks while he may. They're his frollicks anyway. Gosh Penfold......a couplet with rhyme and no reason. Thank G-d for the French ay?
Rest assured WC, (A promising slogan if ever there was one) the multipliyng personalities of your erstwhile enchambered bruvva, are a delight to the eye (only on the written page!) and a feast for the interlect, which is a comode, commodity! to be nurtured in these days of the antipodean antdec creatures.
Cherish his youthful exhuberance and clutch him to your breast as A valon would (well not quite as A valon would

)
He's a promising chap but unlike Joan Collins has not yet promised it to everyone. Treat him as you would a delicate flower and feed him tidbits to encourage his growth into his wig.
Remember when you too were young and feckless. (feck! I said

) Let him spread his wings and glide the corridors of justice with robe, akimbo, and fearing naught but the foreman's bloody stupid question.
(Do I have to pay VAT on this advice?)
If A valon isn't Avalon, but worships at the feet of A valon and A valon is probably a pigment of someone else's imagination, then who's feet is whom worshipping at? My brain really hurts today, but not as much as yesterday, but Not today, not tomorrow, Yesterday only: A long-lasting yesterday/ Devised by us to swallow/ Today with tomorrow.......

oft of late you can find me deep in Graves

Critic2 · Post by **Critic2** » Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:34 pm

Byron wrote:WC, may I plea on michael's behalf to gain a bargain from you.
Any man wot can assemble a card bored box wivout many 'oles, must 'ave sum redeaming feetxxxx....sorry, new computer nerd with bilt in typosystem version 8.3 and a half. As we were saying, his feet have to have some redemptions, what with A Valon dropping everything before them. As the chinese proverb says, each journey starts with weeks of indecision. Let young michael have his frollicks while he may. They're his frollicks anyway. Gosh Penfold......a couplet with rhyme and no reason. Thank G-d for the French ay?
Rest assured WC, (A promising slogan if ever there was one) the multipliyng personalities of your erstwhile enchambered bruvva, are a delight to the eye (only on the written page!) and a feast for the interlect, which is a comode, commodity! to be nurtured in these days of the antipodean antdec creatures.
Cherish his youthful exhuberance and clutch him to your breast as A valon would (well not quite as A valon would )
He's a promising chap but unlike Joan Collins has not yet promised it to everyone. Treat him as you would a delicate flower and feed him tidbits to encourage his growth into his wig.
Remember when you too were young and feckless. (feck! I said ) Let him spread his wings and glide the corridors of justice with robe, akimbo, and fearing naught but the foreman's bloody stupid question.
(Do I have to pay VAT on this advice?)

yes, and council tax, and window tax, and cheeky tax. boy, there's a whole substratathingy of nostalgia when you post on these subjects Former Lord Chief Justice Byron.

Byron · Post by **Byron** » Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:17 am

Too, too kind, kind sir.

"Let it be, in justice, merely said of me........that what I have done, I did......For England, home, and beauty."

Ch: LII (52)

William C. · Post by **William C.** » Tue Dec 14, 2004 3:26 pm

WC, may I plea on michael's behalf to gain a bargain from you.

Absolutely not, as his boss I have to try and make him tow the line. Everyone else in Chambers is getting fed up with him and his inattention to work. I'm going to have to make a decision about Michael very soon.

tom.d.stiller · Post by **tom.d.stiller** » Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:18 pm

William C. wrote:Michael:

Do you want to be fired? Then get back to work!

May I direct the High Court's attention to the real content of Mr. C.'s statement? He is saying that said person Michael has to get back to work if he wants to be fired.

That the witness threatens someone with fire might be of the highest interest to Her Majesty's Prosecutor.

And now he wants to decide. The witness should be made aware of the fact that decisions lie with the Court. If he insists on deciding, I humbly suggest that he should be held in contempt.

The rest is silence. Or rather should be silence.

By the way, Mr. C., are you related to the notorious Mel C?

Avalon · Post by **Avalon** » Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:27 pm

William C, as C2's/ Michael one's boss, please fire the liar as he is so out of control on this board, he will be unable to represent any felons in the future as he IS ONE HIMSELF.
Adieu

lizzytysh · Post by **lizzytysh** » Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:42 pm

Lacking time to do my own legal research [in this case, reading the length of this thread], I would like to remind anyone who enters into this case must be absolutely certain of the integrity of their quotations. This, unfortunately, refers to you, tom.d.stiller.

The alternative is that, if you are correct in your quotation, the violation lies with the orginal speaker, who must then make absolutely certain of how the content of one's phrasings affect the outcome of their meaning. If such be the case, it is to said "Mr. C." to whom I direct my comments.

Tom.d.stiller ~ your input regarding "Mr. C's statement" reads:

"He is saying that said person Michael has to get back to work if he wants to be fired."

If the above statement was, in fact, correctly quoted, this simple matter before the Court is most easily resolved. If said person, Michael, does not want to be fired, then he need only not get back to work.

Forthwith, we shall continue to enjoy the postings of said person, Michael. The settling of this matter has come to you, pro bono, compliments of myself.

Sincerely,
Attorney in absentia,
Lizzytysh

Critic2 · Post by **Critic2** » Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:01 pm

Lizzy, I am not certain of your legal system but we have a "divided profession" in England. Solicitors work either individually or in firms or companies in the ordinary way. So there will be partners who are the "bosses" of the other employees.

I think the Baby Troll Avalon or smokey, whichever is currently posting as William C, has confused solicitors with barristers. Chambers are a collective of self-employed practitioners who practise from the same building and share the same administration. These barristers are independant and don't have a boss.

I always think it is a shame when a troll is so lazy and the trick fails so completely. That doesn't mean a troll thread can't be funny even if it is based on a blunder, but neither smokey nor the useless Avalon show any potential of entertaining me. They are both ill at ease with language and strangers to humour.

lizzytysh · Post by **lizzytysh** » Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:40 pm

Actually, yes, from your description, our systems are similar, C2. So, barrister on

. It looks like a default reprieve for tom.d.stiller, as well. I've heard that humour can be contagious. Is that true?

Critic2 · Post by **Critic2** » Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:07 pm

tom.d.stiller wrote:
William C. wrote:Michael:

Do you want to be fired? Then get back to work!
May I direct the High Court's attention to the real content of Mr. C.'s statement? He is saying that said person Michael has to get back to work if he wants to be fired.

That the witness threatens someone with fire might be of the highest interest to Her Majesty's Prosecutor.

And now he wants to decide. The witness should be made aware of the fact that decisions lie with the Court. If he insists on deciding, I humbly suggest that he should be held in contempt.

The rest is silence. Or rather should be silence.

By the way, Mr. C., are you related to the notorious Mel C?

as I noted on another thread it's the standard of trolling that is so disappointing. Avalon's blunder on this occasion arises from either laziness of expression or a simple inability to express herself coherently. How much more effort would it have taken Avalon to review her troll post and correct the mistake?