Hey TineDoes
I am sure Holydove will answer your question, but I thought I would dig out this old post of hers which may be relevant, to give her a hand:
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=20614&start=15#p212307.
What I understand when Leonard talks about "the other side of waiting", "the other side of loss", "the other side of intimacy", is that he is turning inside out old concepts and habitual ways of being, so as to look beyond them, to look at them as just what they are, concepts, habits of the mind. If we are able to see them as such, we can free ourselves of their empire on us to a certain extent. It's a bit like looking behind the mirror and realizing that the mirror is a construct...
So I think that in the interview Leonard is not saying that he is necessarily free of "waiting for the miracle", as he seems to see this as part of the human condition, but what he is saying is that he is free to come and go as he wishes within and without the concept/habit. This insight (or
outsight, perhaps) is his freedom. And so he explains: "At the other side of waiting, you can act freely—free from right and free from wrong, free from waiting and free from not waiting. That’s the miracle of the song. It led me to that other position where I could look at waiting from the other side."
The last stanza certainly makes more sense if it is understood as ironical, although I don't get that in his tone when he is actually singing the song. Still, I believe it is a likely reading. When you're in a state of distress which nobody seems to really understand, which nobody perhaps is in a position to understand, and they try to help but you know that they will never get it, just forget about it, accept that you cannot be helped, accept your distress. Only you can understand that within your distress, you also have a freedom that they could not comprehend*. Of course I understand that there is a strong Buddhist message in this. I can't help being reminded of Baudelaire's poem, L'Albatros: "Le Poète est semblable au prince des nuées/Qui hante la tempête et se rit de l'archer. . ." (Here is a link to the poem with multiple translations of unequal quality:
http://fleursdumal.org/poem/200). The poet was misunderstood by his contemporaries but was prince of the skies, he flew higher and saw better; he was a seer, a visionary. This can be transposed to "Waiting for the Miracle", in that the narrator is able to see the other side of things; he also, is misunderstood, but he is prince of the skies...
* I assume that it is understood that all human beings have the potential to reach this freedom, but that in the time and space of the song, the protagonists have not yet got to that place.