

Maybe if you spend full price on the cost of the room you can, but in this age of the internet people go for the cheapest deals, and the cheap deals (not much cheaper often, maybe only 10% off, but sometimes maybe half price) you have to pay for the entire cost of the hotel when you book it. There are no refunds. Many people will have to go to France anyway next month, just because they have spent so much they can't get back - much more than the cost of the concert ticket - on travel/hotels. And then they'll have to return again in the Autumn, maybe, for the rescheduled concert. It's obvious that the expected postponment will cost some people more than 1000 euro each in extra expenses. Not something to be dismissed the way some on here seem to be doing. If YOU stood to lose €1000/£950/$1400 would YOU be quite so blase about this whole situation? Surely you can understand people's impatience? The clock is ticking. The first (hopefully) concert is little more than three weeks away. We need to know if it's happening, so we know how much money we need to find from somewhere (to book travel/hotels for the rearranged date) if it isn't... The idle rich may find it funny, but us idle poor need to know where we stand.mutti wrote:I thought hotels let you cancel reservations if you give 48 hours notice
Precisely my point. But no return in the Autumn for me. This was going to be a very special trip. I've also got pet care booked that I can't get out of & other trips in the year I'm committed to. So feel rather annoyed with people who haven't spent a penny telling me to relax. We are now nearly a week since the first announcement of an announcement & still waiting.golo99 wrote:
There are no refunds. Many people will have to go to France anyway next month, just because they have spent so much they can't get back - much more than the cost of the concert ticket - on travel/hotels. And then they'll have to return again in the Autumn, maybe, for the rescheduled concert. It's obvious that the expected postponment will cost some people more than 1000 euro each in extra expenses. Not something to be dismissed the way some on here seem to be doing. If YOU stood to lose €1000/£950/$650 would YOU be quite so blase about this whole situation? Surely you can understand people's impatience? The clock is ticking. The first (hopefully) concert is little more than three weeks away. We need to know if it's happening, so we know how much money we need to find from somewhere (to book travel/hotels for the rearranged date) if it isn't... The idle rich may find it funny, but us idle poor need to know where we stand.
It would probably be prudent to hold off complaining to AEG before the full facts have been made available, and whatever statement they eventually get round to making is made. It would look rather silly if they suddenly announced (even if it looks unlikely right now) "All concerts will go ahead as scheduled," because as people have pointed out before, the "non announcement" wasn't exactly an announcement from AEG, more of an early warning from Jarkko that things are looking problematic.davidrichards wrote:something crazy
Totally agree. Our anger/disgust/comments should be directed to those responsible for this mess - namely AEG.
This is a discussion forum.confetti wrote:I don't think anyone means to be patronising, but the situation is out of your control, there is nothing you can do about it, and dwelling on things to come will not make any difference.