Hi Tchoc ~

OK, so you did follow me, despite pronouncements to the contrary

.
Misquoting and misrepresenting me all the way, whilst getting tangled up in that extension cord you drag along, for the spotlight on your own, dismal lack of observation.
*******************************************************
You said: "What you are doing to me right now (and sometimes to others in other circumstances) is rather sick or evil, Lz."
I say: You appear to have become discombobulated by my coming to the defense of my friends, in detail, via repetition of your own words, with some of mine added in commentary; and then going on with my life. I won't call what you're doing right now "rather sick or evil," but I will call it discombobulated.
I say: You appeared to enjoy the smear campaign you conducted, for them "to realize it was a necessary thing to do and you gain to have done this exercise." Not only was it not a "necesssary . . . exercise" [the latest, politically-correct, sanitized term for 'smear campaign'?] ~ it was totally uncalled for; and a reasonable, detailed response to it has appeared to left you dazed and confused. Not a "gain" for them; and a net loss for you.
I say: To speak positively on some things [what I, in fact, was doing ~ and not even directed to
you] "is rather sick or evil" ~ interesting, hyperbolic comment from someone who likes to keep things stirred, just for the heck of it.
*********************************************************
You said: "writting good English, have good manners"
I say: Well, now there's a flaw I could be working on. Perhaps, you know someone here who could lead me in the direction I
should be going?
**********************************************************
You said: "and answering every post like if this board was your private blog"
I actually said: "I try to read all posts and respond, if inclined, when I can"
I now say: Not only did you miss on what I said. You also miss on what I do. I'd
certainly do better on keeping up if this were my own, private
blog.
*********************************************************
You said: "interpreting whatever you want in any way you want"
I say: Yes, I will continue to do this. That's why
my mind and
my experiences are for ~ still, I take those thoughts and experiences of others into account, as I interpret.
*********************************************************
You said: "on the spot, without giving a second thought"
I say: Hmmm. So you portend to keep track of my timetables, too?
< * watch that cord * >
********************************************************
You said: "without a shadow of a wisdom, in your sole way, for the glory of your ego . . . I trust other people to be able to use their common sense."
I say: I'll trust to the "sane and good people" to make their own decisions on those matters, using their own common sense, which I trust, as well. It appears there may be a Tchoc Standard for what gets shared, a standard I must be in reckless disregard of.
**********************************************************
Well, Tchoc ~ I won't say you've gone
over the edge, just yet; but you're appearing perilously close. You're missing,
altogether, the
fact [those little items you insist that people keep in mind] that I had just 'gone on,' as I do ~ commenting on what interests or touches me in some way, and that I have a moment for sharing my thoughts on.
Perhaps, you also feel I shouldn't have commented on Leonard's recovery of his things, just because you had gone there and commented first;
oooorrrr, that my own comments lacked the merit of yours!?!
Not really sure
what's going on with you right now, Tchoc. You've expressed some paranoic attitudes in the past as to how you're perceived and accepted here; and I've always re-enforced that you are appreciated and welcome. It seems now that, perhaps, you'd like me to join you in your paranoic den? Sorry. I prefer the sunlight. I'll continue to trust in those good and sane people.
By the way, in response to your final comment ~
I'm a poetry lover, and that site link didn't do me a
lick o' good ~ it
would be interesting, I'm sure, however, for poetry lovers who read Finnish or French.
Serious regards,
Elizabeth