The judge has deleted my piece!
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:44 am
deleted.
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:51 am
Did you PM it Martine if you did it will be in your sent box.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:55 am
deleted.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:58 am
deleted.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 2:14 am
Martine~
As i explained, I deleted it because i am not supposed to know who wrote what.
In your PM box there is a an Out box and a Sent box. Check them both. I have never lost anything 'completely' that i have sent. If you somehow have lost it, all i can do is apologize and wonder why it is not there.
regards,
Laurie
As i explained, I deleted it because i am not supposed to know who wrote what.
In your PM box there is a an Out box and a Sent box. Check them both. I have never lost anything 'completely' that i have sent. If you somehow have lost it, all i can do is apologize and wonder why it is not there.
I hope you are only kidding when implying something other than a honest mistake is going on here.Paula, NO nothing is there! How did she do this??
It's all gone.
I smell a rat.
regards,
Laurie
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 2:22 am
deleted.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 2:34 am
Martine~
Everything happens for a reason. Like that proverb of letting something go...and see if it comes back... well, this one got away. Please try again if you are so inclined. It is written in the stars...or karma...
sincerely,
Laurie
Everything happens for a reason. Like that proverb of letting something go...and see if it comes back... well, this one got away. Please try again if you are so inclined. It is written in the stars...or karma...
sincerely,
Laurie
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:28 am
Well, now, Martine 
~ I've just gotten to here, after spelling out the deal regarding PMs. It's absolutely impossible for you not to have a copy. It's an automatic given. Unless there's something mighty strange going on. Some lessons have to work that way, however, just to make certain they get learned. Laurie did the only thing an ethical judge could do ~ there is no way to FW a PM. The only option is to open it, and copy-and-paste it to another, separate PM. In that process, she would periperally see enough to recognize it once she saw it again. She also knew that you would automatically have a copy of it, so deleting it wasn't an issue at all. In reality, she also attempted to preserve your anonymity and not do anything to embarrass you. When she made her general statement, she intentionally bypassed revealing your identity, rather than 'exposing' you.
However, I must say that our procedures were SO clearly spelled out, to begin with, that after telling me that you wouldn't have time to submit one, I'm surprized that you would try to circumvent our procedures. They couldn't have possibly been more clearly spelled out, including the reasoning behind them. Your insistence that it was a/the "Winning" one, the lost masterpiece, of course, makes me wonder what it's all about, anyway. Circumvention, victimization, sabotage, ratso karma, who knows.
I hope you'll dredge that little bugger up somewhere, and send it on. To think that you could zip off a masterpiece, without so much as a rough draft, in this short a time, and then manage to also circumvent Jarkko's cyberworld here, is truly amazing. Karma comes in all forms, doesn't it?
~ I've just gotten to here, after spelling out the deal regarding PMs. It's absolutely impossible for you not to have a copy. It's an automatic given. Unless there's something mighty strange going on. Some lessons have to work that way, however, just to make certain they get learned. Laurie did the only thing an ethical judge could do ~ there is no way to FW a PM. The only option is to open it, and copy-and-paste it to another, separate PM. In that process, she would periperally see enough to recognize it once she saw it again. She also knew that you would automatically have a copy of it, so deleting it wasn't an issue at all. In reality, she also attempted to preserve your anonymity and not do anything to embarrass you. When she made her general statement, she intentionally bypassed revealing your identity, rather than 'exposing' you. However, I must say that our procedures were SO clearly spelled out, to begin with, that after telling me that you wouldn't have time to submit one, I'm surprized that you would try to circumvent our procedures. They couldn't have possibly been more clearly spelled out, including the reasoning behind them. Your insistence that it was a/the "Winning" one, the lost masterpiece, of course, makes me wonder what it's all about, anyway. Circumvention, victimization, sabotage, ratso karma, who knows.
I hope you'll dredge that little bugger up somewhere, and send it on. To think that you could zip off a masterpiece, without so much as a rough draft, in this short a time, and then manage to also circumvent Jarkko's cyberworld here, is truly amazing. Karma comes in all forms, doesn't it?