I've been meaning to come here to say this to you, but have kept getting distracted.
Not that it makes any difference, or matters, but you have already noted that you actually agree on very little with me; so, I guess it's probably the same in return [if you wrote, so I could read more, of how you feel about various things]. This is a case where I happen to disagree with how you feel. In many ways, the story worked for me. And any 'off-colour' references were in character for the characters

However, I definitely feel it's your right to make your comments as you see fit, from your own perspective. Implicit in that is 'without incurring the follow-up comments suggesting you're something other than a lovely woman, who simply has different tastes in humour.' There are other ways you probably could've expressed it [a little less blatantly? perhaps, some constructive suggestions?], to avoid the writer's [seemingly] taking it personally. Nonetheless, I believe you that you didn't know to whom you were addressing your comments on this story. It's simply how you felt ~ the unfortunate alignment of your comments, with the writer of the story, herald back to previous interactions

There are ways you might've expressed how your view of the writing would appeal to a wider [albeit 'narrower' in a certain sense

I can't remember how long you've been around here, but I'm guessing if it were longer, you'd have known that no matter what he might've said 'publicly,' when deadline came, he'd have one ~ if not more ~ entries solidly in place. Maybe that comes from observing his sense of humour and decoy proclamations

At any rate, Nan, I hope you'll continue to work your way through the remainder of the stories, as I'm going to do, and give your own feedback on them. See you on Story D

Respectfully,
Elizabeth