Page 5 of 5

Re: 'dance me to your beauty'

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 4:05 am
by LisaLCFan
Geoffrey wrote:...we ...we ... we ...we ... we ... we ... we ... we ... we ...
Wow, that has to be a record for the most "we"s in one short paragraph (I did not include the "we" in the Donne quote). Who is this "we"? Those aren't my thoughts or feelings. Perhaps you really meant, "I"? (Then again, maybe you did mean "we", Sybil, I mean, Geoffrey!) ;-)

Re: 'dance me to your beauty'

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:52 pm
by Geoffrey
LisaLCFan wrote:
Wow, that has to be a record for the most "we"s in one short paragraph (I did not include the "we" in the Donne quote). Who is this "we"? Those aren't my thoughts or feelings.

a good question. i often ask the same when listening to such lines as "we read from pleasant bibles", "we asked for signs, and signs were sent", "first we take manhattan, then we take berlin", etc., etc.

>Perhaps you really meant, "I"? (Then again, maybe you did mean "we", Sybil, I mean, Geoffrey!) ;-)

well, i can assure you i am not a replica of shirley mason (nor the person suffering from multi personality disorder with whom jesus conversed in mark 5:9). i simply make usage of the collective 'i', as leonard does in 'boogie street': "we are so lightly here, it is in love that we are made and in love we disappear".

finally, leonard gives an example of using the same word multiple times :-)
-g
-------------------------------
"shhh, the sound made around the index finger raised to the lips. shhh, and the roofs are raised against the storm. shhh, the forests are cleared so the wind will not rattle the trees. shhh, the hydrogen rockets go off to silence dissent and variety. it is not an unpleasant noise. it is indeed a perky tune, like the bubbles above a clam. shhh, will everybody listen, please. will the animals stop howling, please. will the belly stop rumbling, please. will time call off its ultrasonic dogs, please. it is the sound my ball pen makes on the hospital paper as i run it down the edge of the red ruler. shhh, it says to the billion unlines of whiteness. shhh, it whispers to the white chaos, lie down in dormitory rows. shhh, it implores the dancing molecules, i love dances but i do not love foreign dances, i love dances that have rules, my rules. wit, invention, shhh, shhh, now do you see why we've soundproofed the forest, carved benches round the wild arena? shhh, hiss, the noise of steam spreads through occupational therapy, it mixes with the sunlight, it bestows a rainbow halo on each bowed head of sufferer, doctor, nurse, volunteer. they do not hear the individual noises. shhh, hiss, they hear the sound of the sounds together."
['beautiful losers]

Re: 'dance me to your beauty'

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 12:21 am
by LisaLCFan
Thank you, Geoffrey, for the very thorough and well-considered response to my question. But, you really ought to have paid me no mind on this particular matter: the use of "we" is one of my major pet-peeves, and drives me nearly insane every time I hear it/read it. I simply cannot be held accountable for my actions when I encounter use of the Royal We, as I find myself annoyed beyond all rationality. It is a personal shortcoming of mine, I realise, to be so enraged by something so small and to find it so hard to resist making a fuss about it, and so I apologise for having allowed it to get the better of me in this instance.

Re: 'dance me to your beauty'

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 2:27 pm
by Geoffrey
LisaLCFan wrote: . . . drives me nearly insane every time I hear it
well, don't worry about it. ears are not always qualified instruments ;-)
bird.jpg

Re: 'dance me to your beauty'

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:53 pm
by LisaLCFan
Nice picture! I assume that you are responsible for the bird.

Birds are absolutely fascinating creatures, and birdsongs, in particular, are truly wondrous. Whilst reading up on the subject, I came upon this fascinating little item:

"The European Wren* sings a song that contains 740 different notes per minute and which can be heard more than 500 metres away. Considering the comparative sizes of you, me and a wren, this is the equivalent of us singing a song that can be heard 4 or 5 miles away."

*any relation? ;-)

http://www.earthlife.net/birds/song.html

http://www.earthlife.net/birds/hearing.html

Re: 'dance me to your beauty'

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:53 am
by Geoffrey
LisaLCFan wrote:
>Nice picture! I assume that you are responsible for the bird.

concerning today's spontaneous little doodle, i timidly admit that you assume correctly.

>Birds are absolutely fascinating creatures, and birdsongs, in particular, are truly wondrous. Whilst reading up on the subject, I came upon this fascinating little item . . .

much gratitude for nudging me towards these revealing internet sites. my imagination was particularly captivated by "a bird can sing two different notes at the same time, or even sing a duet with itself". should we humans be capable of possessing such a talent, perhaps engaging one singer instead of two would reduce the price of concert tickets ;-)

https://youtu.be/Vf42IP__ipw
(for some reason this song makes me think of sicilians and eggplants :-) )