Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:22 pm
What I am thinking just now is: Jees, I saw this documentary two weeks ago, and I can't recall a single really important thing.
Of course that I remember Leonard's parts, and can imagine performers, but usually, if some film gets pale in my memory, it's not good sign. And when I saw it, it appeared that I can comment only by needs of my profession (I am film study scholar), merging it with my Cohen knowledge, and comment editing, biblically-prophetically approach, kitsch scene of his eyes shining from the picture, or close ups, or direction itself, or Leonard's speeches, using the digital effects on his face (focused circle, which leaves even edges of his face unfocused) etc. But nothing behind that - and I remember how much I was thrilled by Armelle Brusq's "Leonard Cohen Spring 96" documentary (and later, by her docu on Piere Cardin, I bumped into it on TV).
Of course that I remember Leonard's parts, and can imagine performers, but usually, if some film gets pale in my memory, it's not good sign. And when I saw it, it appeared that I can comment only by needs of my profession (I am film study scholar), merging it with my Cohen knowledge, and comment editing, biblically-prophetically approach, kitsch scene of his eyes shining from the picture, or close ups, or direction itself, or Leonard's speeches, using the digital effects on his face (focused circle, which leaves even edges of his face unfocused) etc. But nothing behind that - and I remember how much I was thrilled by Armelle Brusq's "Leonard Cohen Spring 96" documentary (and later, by her docu on Piere Cardin, I bumped into it on TV).