Page 3 of 3

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 6:21 am
by Makera
Thank you for the demonstration and confirmation of my point about 'reactions based on presumption and prejudice', Paula! :lol:

Anyone can see the posts, and the minute it took to ADD 'this is a joke, right?'. Not to mention page 2! :roll:

~ Makera

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:57 am
by tom.d.stiller
Charles wrote:Andrew,

I believe those were just typos. Do you know the Latin root for pedantic?

This is my first post to you.

Charles
Believe me, Charles, Andrew isn't really pedantic (or infantile) about a typo. But read a bit into the past years of this this forum, and you'll find p thrashing people for lack of command of their native tongue. he didn't even allow for being colloquial. (Search e. g. for his treat-ice on "irony")

Of course, not exactly being new to this place, you might know the background. If so, the rest is silence. If not so, there's something foul in the state ...

Tom

PS: "typos" occur. but the same typo in several posts is less likely. Though, of course, shit happens, and sometimes horses vomit...

PPS: Of course this is "my first post to you" :P

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:26 pm
by Paula
Makera -posted at 3.05 edited at 3.12. You live in la la land with the fairies for company. You forget I wasn't the only one to see the original post and you didn't just ADD "this is a joke right" you also deleted a paragraph. DON'T TREAT US AS IDIOTS.

What happened on page 2 did I miss something other than your post where you "explained" your orginal comments.

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 10:42 pm
by Critic2
Hi Paula, I have only plonked two people since I have been visiting this forum. Makeera is one (the other is a new but dull troll) partly because of her dreadful poetry but also because of her dishonesty in "argument".

This is only internet not real life, but whereas a challenging spat is really good fun it becomes pointless when someone consistently lies. It is true that I still see her posts when others comment on them but otherwise she is, unsurpirsingly, not missed.

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 11:46 pm
by Makera
There really is no need to persist in proving my point, Paula. :D
But, since you insist...

The 'minute' to which I referred was that which elapsed between my edit (to add, NOT "delete") and Taigaku's post in which he referred to mine...
Are you grasping it yet? Just ask Taigaku if there were anything other than, 'WHAT the...??!!', in my post. Or, are you suggesting he was hallucinating!? :roll:

It really never ceases to amaze me the lengths to which some will go to "remove all doubt" about their ability to grasp basic self-evident facts.
Not to mention exposing their delusions of 'psychic insight' into others' motives, intentions and actions! :P

The last incoherent drivel from C2 is yet another illustration.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 1:08 am
by Paula
You are so right C2 and as porkies are a way of life for some I will have selective vision too.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 4:31 pm
by Avalon
You are all liars on this forum, esp that Partisan Plonker
Adieu.