The Incredible Slowness of Being (Laurie)
Paula, the operative word there is "seem", to you. There is no "nastiness" intended on my part, except for pointed sarcasm to those making no secret of their own nastiness (disguised as "banter")!Paula wrote:Mareka banter is good natured that is the the distinction. Your responses always seem to have an underlying nastiness which always promotes the righteousness perfection, godliness that is Mareka.
I don't go out of my way to misspell people's names, nom de plumes or otherwise, either.
~ Makera
Last edited by Makera on Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What you're saying would hold up better, Makera, if it weren't for the fact that this contest's entries were anonymous as to their authorship.
For clarification, I also have not been involved in the judging [Martine
and any/all others]. I ~ as always ~ have only my personal taste, upon which to draw. I know nothing of the mechanics of poetry ~ however, our esteemed judge does!
The idea of winners/losers is not a good one for poetry to begin with ~ I prefer winners/non-winners for starters....and even so, there are other ways to approach the competition, which I suspect will be done here.
For clarification, I also have not been involved in the judging [Martine
and any/all others]. I ~ as always ~ have only my personal taste, upon which to draw. I know nothing of the mechanics of poetry ~ however, our esteemed judge does!The idea of winners/losers is not a good one for poetry to begin with ~ I prefer winners/non-winners for starters....and even so, there are other ways to approach the competition, which I suspect will be done here.
Yeah, Liz, that helps for the judging... but not the aftermath . Some hold 'blind' comps on AP as well (although the numbers of users on the site tends to make it virtually equivalent to anonymity).
I shall share your optimism in the good grace of the entrants. I agree with your "winner/non winner" perspective of course, as I said.
~ Makera
. Some hold 'blind' comps on AP as well (although the numbers of users on the site tends to make it virtually equivalent to anonymity).I shall share your optimism in the good grace of the entrants. I agree with your "winner/non winner" perspective of course, as I said.
~ Makera
Makera
I don't go out of my way to misspell people's names, nom de plumes or otherwise, either.
Neither do I if I have spelt your name incorrectly it was not deliberate.
Perhaps you should read through some of your previous posts and see why it "seems" to me nastiness was intended. Do you have selective vision, do you think all these "pearls of wisdom" you bestow on us are gratefully received as you obviously think we don't have a brain cell between us. You patronise in every word you write.
I don't go out of my way to misspell people's names, nom de plumes or otherwise, either.
Neither do I if I have spelt your name incorrectly it was not deliberate.
Perhaps you should read through some of your previous posts and see why it "seems" to me nastiness was intended. Do you have selective vision, do you think all these "pearls of wisdom" you bestow on us are gratefully received as you obviously think we don't have a brain cell between us. You patronise in every word you write.