lizzytysh wrote:~ however, while you are feeling disappointed in me, I am feeling equally disappointed in you.
~ Lizzy
Lizzy -
what's in a disappointment? What
is a disappointment? "A failure to satisfy the hope, desire, or expectation of someone", or: the action doesn't meet the expectations.
So you are disappointed by the way I acted. I'd regret that. But it proves that your expectations had been high-strung. I'm honoured by that.
You are perfectly right: There have been others than you who didn't handle the situation that arose in this thread in a way I could approve of. Just to give an example I could mention bee's remark about you wasting the tax payers' money when reading and posting to this forum while at work. (Aside: Indeed, bee, this was below the belt, and you know that.)
But I have said it elsewhere, and more than once: the bee must sting, and she always does when someone criticises
her bee-lovèd president. Most of those who don't feel as obliged to GWB as bee have been victims of her "stings". You have, Linda has, you know that I have. So I couldn't be disappointed by her getting into nasty remarks. (Aside again: But, indeed, bee, this never led to lasting enmity, or did it?)
You will have recognized, Elizabeth, that I didn't join the club of those who accuse you of "flooding the forum". This is simply because I don't think you do. Everyone will post as much, and in such style, as befits her or his personality. (Besides, I always agreed with what one of the great Marxes - Julius Henry, called 'Groucho' - once said: "I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members.")
Some people may feel that you post too much, or in a too emotional style, or essentially the same thing too often. I don't share any of these positions, but I make allowance for their stance.
Rudyard Kipling, who
was a racist, though not of the ranting and raving and raging kind - he cared for those non-British souls, and he loved them, I think, but "a philo-Semite is an anti-Semite who happens to love the Jews" -, this Kipling wrote in a poem called "If":
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or, being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or, being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise;
From you, as one of the most experienced posters on this forum, I should have expected to "keep your head". Indeed, I was disappointed that you didn't. That's why I criticised you rather than someone else.
I could come back to details, but I believe that you yourself will be able to see them without me pointing at "the mote".
One final remark, as I'm typing this into my laptop computer while on a train that's already approaching it's (and my) destination:
Of course you didn't expect me to take to your side in this rather runaway discussion. You know that I never took anybody's side, but rather stood my own ground, and more often than not I was pleased to find out that others were on the same side of the matter, though for their own reasons I respected. You and I found ourselves on the same side of many issues, and I believe that this will happen over and over again. I just didn't approve of some remarks you made.
Cheers
tom
PS: My absence was due to having been "burnt out from exhaustion", then I restored my power on a long vacation. Right now I'm busy preparing something - but this will be published in due time. After that - it is already visible on the horizon - I'll come back to
flood the forum, as I sadly had to find out that I'm down to rank 12 in ~greg's modified top ten listing...