Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:56 am
Thank you very much, Lightning
. The person I originally contacted never responded, and your coming through
is not in the least surprizing, and I appreciate it. It seems I wasn't tooooo far off base ~ at least had the essence, if not the correct words. Yours certainly reads better than mine, and more flowing ~ surprize
surprize
~
.
Yeah, sorta cliched, it is. Still, is it the chicken or the egg? Has this type of concept, with rallying wording, come to be cliched because it's what's more typically used in anthem-type compositions? Is what we're seeing here simply anthem vernacular? At least it's moving in a positive direction. Since children sing these songs from childhood on, and the ideas become part of who they are, better they be inclusive and embracing ideas [having the intent of moving toward a better world], even if cliched.
The initial phrase of what you wrote is definitely not cliched
. Did they use it?
Thanks, again, Lightning
.
Love,
Elizabeth





Yeah, sorta cliched, it is. Still, is it the chicken or the egg? Has this type of concept, with rallying wording, come to be cliched because it's what's more typically used in anthem-type compositions? Is what we're seeing here simply anthem vernacular? At least it's moving in a positive direction. Since children sing these songs from childhood on, and the ideas become part of who they are, better they be inclusive and embracing ideas [having the intent of moving toward a better world], even if cliched.
The initial phrase of what you wrote is definitely not cliched

Thanks, again, Lightning

Love,
Elizabeth