Page 2 of 3

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:03 am
by tom.d.stiller
YdF ~

at times you were funny. But it seems you're running out of inspiration. Your repetitions are giving us the same nonsense over and over. It starts to bore me... Try to think of a new joke - or be quiet.

Leonard is a master of repetition. He gives new meaning to every single word with every repetition.

You seem to be a master of a lesser art: you give diferent words to the same meaning... Not too bad, but...

Tom

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:11 am
by tom.d.stiller
Anne-Marie ~

don't let any of this discourage you. Just keep on. Tomorrow YdF might say that you are me and we are all together.

They will disappear... as time goes by...

Maybe the best strategy is to ignore the YdFs of this world. I'll try to do so. (Success improbable...)

Tom

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:25 am
by Critic2
tom.d.stiller wrote:Anne-Marie ~

don't let any of this discourage you. Just keep on. Tomorrow YdF might say that you are me and we are all together.

They will disappear... as time goes by...

Maybe the best strategy is to ignore the YdFs of this world. I'll try to do so. (Success improbable...)

Tom
not for one second does ydf really think Anne Marie is me. not for one second does he care that he may drive away a welcome new poster here. not for one second does ydf have the guts to apologise. not for one second is he worth responding to.

Y esterday's
D ull
F ool

Y ou
D im
F ucker

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:07 pm
by tom.d.stiller
Critic2 wrote: Y esterday's
D ull
F ool

Y ou
D im
F ucker
no comment...

Don't be so angry. Four letter words won't improve three letter persons.

And: at least I wouldn't want any censorship. Not for you, not for the YDFs of this world.

Rational startegy can be either to ignore them or to oppose them.

Tom

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:18 pm
by Critic2
tom.d.stiller wrote:
Critic2 wrote: Y esterday's
D ull
F ool

Y ou
D im
F ucker
no comment...

Don't be so angry. Four letter words won't improve three letter persons.

And: at least I wouldn't want any censorship. Not for you, not for the YDFs of this world.

Rational startegy can be either to ignore them or to oppose them.

Tom
if I used emotithingys i would have been able to show contempt and you wouldn't have mistaken it for anger. none of the baby trolls have ever moved me (although Avalon's homophobia disgusted me ).

btw I think your new word "startegy" has great potential. It explains as an opening tactic that we ignore the baby trolls, if we fail then we can try something else using all our "endergy" perhaps.

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:36 pm
by tom.d.stiller
sometimes typos can be the beginnig of neologisms. "startegy" - thank you, c2, for detecting this one...

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:59 pm
by Anne-Marie
:arrow:

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:50 pm
by linda_lakeside
tom.d.stiller wrote: you are me and we are all together
Do you know the words to 'It Had to be You'?

Sorry, I wanted to get involved but I didn't want to argue. I like the poem very much. As a matter of fact, I've been following your posts since you've been here, Anne-Marie. Again, nice poem.

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:53 pm
by linda_lakeside
Oh, I know what I forgot! I know this isn't the time or the place but I don't what the time or place might be so I'll just press on.

Not being familiar with all the techno-gizmos in this forum, I was wondering why my 'edit' flag keeps following me around. It never stops. How do I get it to leave me alone?

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:58 pm
by Critic2
linda_lakeside wrote:Oh, I know what I forgot! I know this isn't the time or the place but I don't what the time or place might be so I'll just press on.

Not being familiar with all the techno-gizmos in this forum, I was wondering why my 'edit' flag keeps following me around. It never stops. How do I get it to leave me alone?
just wait until it starts flagging?

Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:01 am
by lizzytysh
Trying to ascertain your question, Linda. You always have the "Edit" button available on each of your own postings, so if anytime you wish to edit, you'll be able to ~ on your own postings [well, in most places, anyway ~ huh, Paula :wink: ]. Is it something other than that, that you're referring to, though?

~ Lizzy

Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 5:58 am
by linda_lakeside
Hi Lizzy,

Please note my other posts directly above - 'edit' sits there like a cockroach on a birthday cake. The posts of others just have 'quote'. I can understand having the 'edit' just after posting but not a month after!

Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:53 am
by IAMAHOTEL
Critic2 wrote:
not for one second does he care that he may drive away a welcome new poster here.

Remember Else? You ran her off this Forum with your visciousness. I haven't forgotten how you treated her. All this faux niceness now on your part is a lot of baloney. I hope Young dr. Freud continues to nail your hide to the wall.

Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 5:18 pm
by lizzytysh
Dear Linda ~

:wink: :lol: :wink: ~ In reality, the Edit box sits only visible to you! This is because only you have the option available to Edit your postings. If others had that option, that Edit box would be visible to others, as well. However, it's not. You don't see others' Edit box because you cannot Edit their postings [hence you have no need of that box].

In reality, months and even years later, you CAN go back and Edit your own postings. However, you will always have that dreaded [to me] "edited" message appear at the bottom of that posting.

If this explanation doesn't work, I'll try again :wink: .

~ Lizzy

Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:06 pm
by linda_lakeside
Lizzy ~

And there is my answer so nice and neat and complete. :roll: Thanks, it was really bugging me! As does the 'edit' line.

Like you, I've never taken part in other message boards, forums or chat rooms so I don't always know how these things work. At the end of all this, I'll be a pro. Tks.

Linda