Mon ami Didier! Hello!
Sorry Didier, it is a serious matter, I am not into a sado-maso enterprise-game style "Fais-moi mal, Johnny-Johnny-Johnny" please go shake the red cloth in front of somebody else, sorry. Nice to hear of you though.
P.S. My numerous posts are far less confused - if they are for a clear mind, I mean (yes, this is mean - a joke) that yout sole one, here, D. - and the serial of contradictory posts of Tom, btw. My question was very simple to understand and to answer.
Jurica, it is not that I don't like you, it is that your evident lack of any sense of humour, and your judgmental attitude toward people that you seem to have in so low estime in your posts, they are all stupid, stupid cow, ignorant, not able to vote, etc. etc. etc. name it, that I feel helpless to communicate with you in a satisfaying manner. All I expect from you is insults and disrespect. However, your memory - as the memory goes - did not stock exact souvenirs, dear, as I came "to your rescue" so to speak when you where attacked for the only purpose that you were a newbie and having a nice site. You can do a search if you want I doubt you will, but you'll see it is not all black as you painted it. It is up to you.
P.S. : If I did not send an e-mail, it is because my experience of explanations behing closed doors on the sole basis of the trust I had on the person went very bad in the past.
P.S. : I was not insulted by PLEASE, I laughed, when I read it, I imagined an exasperated straight guy that has to deal with chatty imaginative people - I wrote it was selfish and could have hurt the sensitive people, I still think it. I also wrote that it was not realistic that it would stop the bla-bla in this section - and it is- and I also wrote that the navigation is more easy now. You are free to retain the content of my posts as you want. But please be careful that you stress only what you have read and retained.
Here, I will answer Tom.
1) For the little history - and I don't bring the e-mail (proof) here unless you ask me to do it, this wikipédia page was up-dated after our exchange of email of January 3, 2005 - in which I gave you and Jurica the adress of the page where you can add you site to the list.
2) I already answered regarding the FLCS. This is irrelevant for the question I asked to you.
3) Thank you to have answered my question. The many twists and contradictions in your answer, mixed with the very clear information gives me to think you two were not even clear in this regard.
Everything is clear now and I wish long live to your Leonard Cohen site!
You have the choice, guys, to stay angry at me or to realize it was a necessary thing to do and you gain to have done this exercise.
Now we can shake hands or you can turn your back at me in grumbling. Your 50% in the good relationship with me, I can not do for you.
***
Now, ey! Tom. Some little clarifications seem necessary :
Yes I do think that became, with time, a little - euh - careless with people who seems without any - euh - "power" of some sort and that you give too much credit to the other. And yes it irritates me. But you are not the one. It is the archeic culture of forum to beat the feables. And yes it is a recurrent theme of mine, not only with you, though, should you read my posts in general. The fact, in your case, that I had a favorable prejudice toward you, I though you were not playing this kind of game, well.... this explain the rest. OK?
I'm not embarass at all. Even in the case my assumption would have been proved wrong. I'm not of these kinds of people that can not admit a mistake without being embarassed and stubornly continue the error ad nauseam. I'm not as fool as to think I'm always right, nor any human being. I'm not embarass to be a human being. And I don't embarass people who make mistakes and correct it after, if you remark. That is just life to me. We are all planes that have to correct our cruise to arrive. OK, I stop the lecture.
Which endless apologizes are you talking about, exactly? Are you sure you are talking about me?
Re BL. Yes a self councious shocking book it is as you stressed. Still shocking. For example, for me a rape is shocking. I can't figure how it can not be shocking for some person but a sexual predator. Really. Not that I classify you in this category. Just that I wonder if you have read this book with all your sensitivity and not only your intellect.
i have to run, timer is out of time!!
Take care Ev!!!