Kush, thank you. I take your comments about my posts as a compliment and I'm touched that you have taken the time to read me and understand where I was going and - the most important - my dry sens of humour.
But I don't care if the thread is deleted. And I don't care also if it is not.
I understand that it may be weird for some people not to take the side of a person to the detriment of another one. I try to take the side of common sense and reality. I hope it will clarify my position.
For the misunderstanding between Songster and Kush, I think the problem, here, occured because you two are not talking about the samething exactly.
Songster is talking about his (or her but I would say him) empirical experience as a brat and how he had repent and why it was bad, and he is using the exemple of SC's case to make is point and we can perceive a lot of guilt and a lot of good will to repair what he may have done. Interesting, but Kush is talking about the present, the specific case of SC. So you can not understand each other and get frustrated about this. No need to continue I think that you both agree on the essential.
There is other topics that came out of all this and that are not the major problem of SC's case, but seem to be far more important for some people, here, I think about Coco, Hermitage, and Songster :
- The woman used as a sex object, or
- Pornographia as something bad for women.
For others it was :
- obscenities on this forum
- not to play rude (like a bully) on this board
Maybe you could discuss about it wihtout mix up all the threads and emotions and ideas.
Now, I have to go back to the Tavern, and don't know when I could come back. So you will have a breakt!!:lol: But when I leave this is not caused by any of you. It it just that I feel the subject is close for me or because I just do not have much time to participate properly.
Take care! And cheers a little bit. Ay!